Several left-wing feminists failed to rally around Judge Amy Coney Barrett as her confirmation hearings kicked off, mocking her and belittling her status as a mother of seven children.
Feminist author Lauren Hough unleashed a slew of attacks on Barrett on Monday, remarking, “It’s a very weird thing to watch these old creeps congratulate a handmaid on her clown car vagina.”
“You can tell a lot about how a judge will rule by her fertility so I’m glad she’s already proven hers because the cervix check really shouldn’t be done live,” she mocked, adding, “But I’m excited for her to share her casserole recipe and some stain-removal tips”:
You can tell a lot about how a judge will rule by her fertility so I’m glad she’s already proven hers because the cervix check really shouldn’t be done live. But I’m excited for her to share her casserole recipe and some stain-removal tips.
— Lauren Hough (@laurenthehough) October 12, 2020
She continued belittling Barrett’s status as a mother on Tuesday, sarcastically asking, “Does anyone know if Amy Coney Barrett has kids or a family?”
Does anyone know if Amy Coney Barrett has kids or a family?
— Lauren Hough (@laurenthehough) October 13, 2020
This fucking sham where everyone pretends the entire point of Amy Coney Barrett isn’t to overturn Roe, Casey, Obergefell, and knock down the ACA. But she has nice kids lovely super good mom nice kids they’re so well behaved do you recommend spanking haha kidding good mom
— Lauren Hough (@laurenthehough) October 13, 2020
Author, activist, and self-described “expert in online hate & harassment” Soraya Chemaly expressed anger at the GOP for presenting Barrett as a “support of women’s power,” calling her a “prototypical ‘exceptional woman’ of gender ideology”:
The GOP trotting out ACB as a support of women’s power is beyond disingenuous. She’s a prototypical “exceptional woman” of gender ideology. If you considered only GOP women in office, US would rank ~130th globally for women’s representation, like hybrid authoritarian regimes.
— Soraya Chemaly (@schemaly) October 13, 2020
Like others, politics writer Laura Bassett also targeted Barrett’s status as a mother.
“Republicans’ argument today, in sum: ‘We love her because she’s a mom, and she will force you to be a mom too. If you don’t love that then you must a party that hates moms,’” she said:
Republicans' argument today, in sum: "We love her because she's a mom, and she will force you to be a mom too. If you don't love that then you must a party that hates moms."
— Laura Bassett (@LEBassett) October 12, 2020
Leftist filmmaker Michael Moore also piled on, posting a deceptively edited photo of Barrett in a red dress, comparing her to a handmaid. The dress Barrett wore on Monday was hot pink — not red:
Under His eye. Blessed be the fruit. pic.twitter.com/gzRcabxqB7
— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) October 12, 2020
Washington Post contributor Jill Filipovic suggested that the GOP has “emphasized Amy Coney Barrett’s fertility and family size.”
“It’s almost like the message is, ok you’re a very successful Career Woman, but you’ve justified your selfish ambitions by having seven kids so it’s ok,” she said. Fellow Post contributor Helaine Olen appeared to agree, taking issue with the emphasis on Barrett’s family:
It does seem telling that the Republicans who have spoken so far have emphasized Amy Coney Barrett's fertility and family size. It's almost like the message is, ok you're a very successful Career Woman, but you've justified your selfish ambitions by having seven kids so it's ok.
— Jill Filipovic (@JillFilipovic) October 12, 2020
By the way, I'm really tired of hearing about Amy Coney Barrett's family. I'm sure she's a great mom! I'm sure she's better than me! (I can barely manage 2 kids, never mind 7). But she's not getting voted into a parenting position. Let's move on.
— Helaine Olen (@helaineolen) October 12, 2020
Filipovic also asked, “Has anyone ever called a male judge a ‘working dad’?”:
"Judge Roberts, you're a tireless working father. If appointed, you would be the only judge on the Supreme Court who is a father of school-age children. I’ll bet there are many young men, like my own two sons, who marvel at the balance you have achieved." <– No one
— Jill Filipovic (@JillFilipovic) October 12, 2020
Barrett briefly addressed the attacks against her and her family during Tuesday’s hearing. She and her husband had a very brief amount of time to make a decision with “momentous consequences for our family,” she said.
“We knew that our lives would be combed over for any negative detail. We knew our faith would be caricatured. We knew our family would be attacked,” she said:
And so we had to decide whether those difficulties would be worth it, because what sane person would go through that if there wasn’t a benefit on the other side? And the benefit, I think, is that I’m committed to the rule of law and the role of the Supreme Court in dispensing equal justice for all. I’m not the only person who could do this job, but I was asked and it would be difficult for anyone, so why should I say someone else should do the difficulty if the difficulty is the only reason to say no?
“I should serve my country, and my family is all in on that because they share my belief in the rule of law,” she added.
COMMENTS
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.